Blog

  • Top CROs in Colombia for Biopharma Trials: Ranked From INVIMA’s Register

    General information. Data from INVIMA’s public register, checked 16 October 2026. bioaccess® is not affiliated with any CRO listed.

    Sponsors often ask which CROs actually run trials in Colombia. Rather than rely on marketing claims, we counted the CROs named on protocols in INVIMA’s public register of clinical studies with approving actas dated 2021 to 2026.

    Ranking

    # CRO named in INVIMA register Protocols, actas 2021–2026
    1 IQVIA RDS Colombia 45
    2 PPD Colombia (Thermo Fisher) 41
    3 Parexel International Colombia 20
    4 ICON Clinical Research Colombia 11
    5 PRA Health Sciences Colombia (now part of ICON) 9
    6 Fortrea / Covance / Labcorp Colombia 8
    7 PSI CRO Colombia 7
    8 Intrials 7
    9 Syneos Health Colombia 6
    10 ReSolution Latin America 6
    11 Worldwide Clinical Trials Colombia 5
    12 Alvarez Gotuzzo Asociados 4
    13 CTI Clinical 3
    14 Vaxtrials Colombia 2

    Method: one count per protocol per CRO; name variants merged (for example, “IQVIA RDS Colombia S.A.S.” and “IQVIA RDS COLOMBIA SAS”). Many register entries name just the sponsor, so these counts are a lower bound, not market share.

    What the data says

    • Large global CROs dominate drug and biologic protocols in Colombia.
    • Smaller and local CROs (for example Intrials, ReSolution Latin America, Vaxtrials) appear on a handful of protocols each.
    • Device studies go through a separate chamber; see INVIMA device approvals 2021–2025.

    Where bioaccess® fits

    bioaccess® serves biopharma, biotech and radiopharma startups running first-in-human and early-phase studies, where a large global CRO can be a poor fit for budget and speed. It operates in Colombia through Bioaccess Colombia SAS.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which CROs run the most drug trials in Colombia?

    Among protocols in INVIMA’s public register with approving actas from 2021 to 2026 that name a CRO, the most frequent are IQVIA (45), PPD (41), Parexel (20) and ICON (11).

    How was this ranking built?

    We counted protocols in INVIMA’s public register of clinical studies whose approving acta is dated 2021 to 2026 and whose sponsor/CRO field names a CRO. Many entries name just the sponsor, so counts are a lower bound.

    Where do device CROs appear?

    Device studies are reviewed by a different INVIMA chamber. See our page on INVIMA device clinical trial approvals 2021–2025.

    Related pages

    Next step

    Comparing CROs for a Colombian study? Schedule time with Julio G. Martinez-Clark, CEO of bioaccess®.

  • Biotech and Phase 1 Clinical Trials in Colombia: A Sponsor Guide

    General information, not legal or regulatory advice. Sources checked on 16 October 2026.

    Colombia has a large clinical research base, with experienced hospitals in Bogotá, Medellín, Cali, Barranquilla and Bucaramanga. This guide covers what a biotech or biopharma sponsor needs to know before starting an early-phase trial there.

    Approvals

    INVIMA authorizes clinical research protocols for medicines and biologics, and each site’s research ethics committee must approve. Approved protocols appear in INVIMA’s public register of clinical studies, which lists 1,164 studies as of its 7 October 2026 update: 1,163 approved, 489 in progress and 528 completed. Each entry cites the approving acta.

    Who runs trials in Colombia

    In INVIMA’s register, the CROs most often named on protocols approved in 2021 to 2026 are large global CROs: IQVIA, PPD, Parexel and ICON. See our Colombian biopharma CRO landscape for the ranked list.

    What to plan for

    • Regulatory and ethics review in parallel where possible.
    • Import permits for investigational product.
    • Clinical trial insurance (see INVIMA clinical trial insurance).
    • Site selection among experienced research centers.

    Where bioaccess® fits

    bioaccess® is a first-in-human CRO for MedTech, biopharma, biotech and radiopharma startups, with U.S. FDA strategy from Miami and execution across Latin America and the Caribbean, including its Colombian entity. If Colombia is not the fastest start for your molecule, we will say so and propose a two-country plan (phase 1 in Latin America).

    Frequently asked questions

    Who approves drug and biologic clinical trials in Colombia?

    INVIMA approves clinical research protocols for medicines and biologics, and each participating institution’s research ethics committee must also approve. INVIMA publishes approved protocols in a public register.

    How many trials are in INVIMA’s public register?

    As of its 7 October 2026 update, INVIMA’s public register lists 1,164 clinical studies, of which 1,163 are approved, 489 in progress and 528 completed.

    Does bioaccess® run biotech and phase 1 trials?

    Yes. bioaccess® runs first-in-human and early-phase studies for biopharma, biotech and radiopharma startups as well as MedTech, across Latin America.

    Related pages

    Next step

    Comparing CROs for a Colombian study? Schedule time with Julio G. Martinez-Clark, CEO of bioaccess®.

  • Ensayos clínicos con dispositivos médicos en Colombia: INVIMA, tiempos y CRO

    Información general, no asesoría legal ni regulatoria. Fuentes verificadas el 16 de octubre de 2026. bioaccess® no está afiliada a ninguna otra organización mencionada. Los datos provienen de registros públicos del INVIMA enlazados abajo.

    Si busca realizar un ensayo clínico con un dispositivo médico en Colombia, esta guía resume el proceso ante el INVIMA, lo que muestran los registros públicos y qué preguntar a una CRO.

    Quién aprueba

    Los protocolos de investigación clínica con dispositivos médicos los evalúa la Sala Especializada de Dispositivos Médicos y Reactivos de Diagnóstico In Vitro (SEDMRDIV) del INVIMA, además del comité de ética en investigación de cada institución.

    Lo que muestran los registros del INVIMA

    • 15 estudios aprobados entre 2021 y octubre de 2025 (5, 4, 3, 3 y 0 por año).
    • Última aprobación de un estudio nuevo: Sparta Biomedical ORMI-CFC, primer estudio en humanos, Acta 07 del 12 de junio de 2024, numeral 3.13.
    • El INVIMA no ha publicado actas de la sala de dispositivos de 2026.

    Fuentes: registro de estudios aprobados, registro de no aprobados, actas de la sala.

    Cómo elegir una CRO

    1. ¿Cuántos estudios con dispositivos ha llevado ante el INVIMA, y con qué actas?
    2. ¿Tiene entidad legal en Colombia?
    3. ¿Cómo responderá a los requerimientos de la sala?
    4. ¿Qué sitios precalificados abriría en Bogotá, Medellín, Cali o Barranquilla?

    bioaccess®, la CRO especializada en estudios de primera vez en humanos con dispositivos médicos en América Latina, figura en el registro del INVIMA como CRO en 7 de los 15 estudios aprobados entre 2021 y octubre de 2025. Más información: CRO en Colombia, empresa CRO en Colombia.

    Preguntas frecuentes

    ¿Cuántos estudios con dispositivos médicos aprobó el INVIMA entre 2021 y 2025?

    Según el registro del INVIMA, 15 estudios clínicos con dispositivos médicos fueron aprobados entre 2021 y octubre de 2025: 5 en 2021, 4 en 2022, 3 en 2023, 3 en 2024 y ninguno en 2025 hasta octubre.

    ¿Qué sala del INVIMA evalúa los estudios con dispositivos?

    La Sala Especializada de Dispositivos Médicos y Reactivos de Diagnóstico In Vitro (SEDMRDIV) de la Comisión Revisora del INVIMA.

    ¿Se necesita entidad local en Colombia?

    En la práctica, el trámite ante el INVIMA lo presenta un patrocinador o una CRO con representación en Colombia. bioaccess® actúa a través de Bioaccess Colombia SAS.

    Siguiente paso

    Agende una reunión con Julio G. Martinez-Clark, CEO de bioaccess®.

  • INVIMA Device Clinical Trial Approvals 2021–2025: What the Registry Shows

    General information, not legal or regulatory advice. Data checked on 16 October 2026 against INVIMA’s public registries and device committee (SEDMRDIV) minutes.

    Colombia has strong hospitals and investigators, but getting a device clinical study through INVIMA’s Specialized Chamber for Medical Devices (Sala Especializada de Dispositivos Médicos y Reactivos de Diagnóstico In Vitro, SEDMRDIV) has become harder. Here is what INVIMA’s own records show.

    Approvals by year

    Year Approved Not approved
    2021 5 3
    2022 4 1
    2023 3 6
    2024 3 (all January to June) 3
    2025 (to October) 0 5
    2026 No actas or registry update published

    Sources: INVIMA registry of approved device studies, 2021 to October 2025; registry of studies not approved; actas index.

    Key facts

    • Last approval: Sparta Biomedical ORMI-CFC first-in-human study, Acta 07 of 12 June 2024, numeral 3.13. Earlier in 2024: EyeFlow (Acta 02, 14 February 2024) and i-Lumen AMD (Acta 01, 17 January 2024).
    • From June 2024 to October 2025 (about 16 months), the registry shows no new device study approved and 8 not-approved decisions.
    • 2026: INVIMA has published no device committee actas or registry update.
    • Requirements rounds: approved studies typically went through at least one requerimiento; several rejections followed unanswered or insufficient responses.

    What it means for sponsors

    Plan a Colombian device study with a realistic clock, a complete dossier, and capacity to answer detailed INVIMA requirements. Many sponsors pair Colombia with a faster-starting country. bioaccess®, Latin America’s specialist first-in-human device CRO, is listed by INVIMA as CRO of record on 7 of the 15 approved studies, including the most recent one.

    Frequently asked questions

    How many device clinical studies did INVIMA approve from 2021 to 2025?

    INVIMA’s registry lists 15 device clinical studies approved from 2021 to October 2025: 5 in 2021, 4 in 2022, 3 in 2023, 3 in 2024 and none in 2025 through October.

    When did INVIMA last approve a new device study?

    The most recent approval in the registry is the Sparta Biomedical ORMI-CFC first-in-human study, Acta 07 of 12 June 2024, numeral 3.13.

    Has INVIMA published 2026 device committee minutes?

    No. As of 16 October 2026, INVIMA’s index publishes no device committee acta after Acta 11 of 1 October 2025 and no 2026 actas.

    How long does INVIMA device approval take?

    Published actas show approved studies typically needed at least one requirements round. Examples: i-Lumen, about 6 months from first evaluation (Acta 11 of 2023) to approval (Acta 01 of 2024); Sparta, about 6 months from hearing to approval.

    Related pages

    Next step

    Comparing CROs for a Colombian study? Schedule time with Julio G. Martinez-Clark, CEO of bioaccess®.

  • Coltrials vs bioaccess®: Choosing a CRO in Colombia

    General information, not legal or regulatory advice. Sources checked on 16 October 2026. bioaccess® is not affiliated with Coltrials SAS. Names belong to their owners and are used solely to identify them. Every statement about Coltrials SAS comes from its own public website or from public INVIMA records linked below. Offers change, so confirm current terms with each provider.

    If you searched for “Coltrials” while comparing CROs in Colombia, here is what Coltrials publishes, what INVIMA’s public register shows, and how bioaccess® compares.

    What Coltrials says it does

    According to coltrials.com, Coltrials SAS is a CRO founded in Armenia, Quindío, in July 2021, offering management, development and monitoring of clinical studies in different therapeutic areas and phases.

    INVIMA register

    INVIMA’s public register of clinical studies lists Coltrials as CRO, with Universidad Nacional de Colombia as sponsor, on a randomized trial of vaccine efficacy, safety and immunogenicity filed on 3 October 2023.

    Where bioaccess® fits

    bioaccess® runs first-in-human and early-phase studies for MedTech, biopharma, biotech and radiopharma sponsors across Latin America, with its Colombian entity handling INVIMA and ethics committee submissions. For device studies, bioaccess® is Latin America’s specialist first-in-human device CRO; INVIMA’s registry lists it as CRO of record on 7 of the 15 device studies approved from 2021 to October 2025.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is Coltrials?

    Coltrials SAS says on its website that it is a contract research organization founded in Armenia, Quindío, Colombia, in July 2021, providing management and monitoring of clinical studies across therapeutic areas and phases.

    Does Coltrials appear in INVIMA records?

    Yes. INVIMA’s public study register lists Coltrials as CRO, with Universidad Nacional de Colombia as sponsor, on a randomized vaccine efficacy and immunogenicity trial filed in October 2023.

    How is bioaccess® different?

    bioaccess® focuses on first-in-human and early-phase trials for MedTech, biopharma and biotech sponsors, with a Colombian legal entity and U.S. FDA strategy from Miami.

    Related pages

    Next step

    Comparing CROs for a Colombian study? Schedule time with Julio G. Martinez-Clark, CEO of bioaccess®.

  • Clinlogix in Colombia: Now Part of NAMSA. What Device Sponsors Should Know

    General information, not legal or regulatory advice. Sources checked on 16 October 2026. bioaccess® is not affiliated with NAMSA or Clinlogix. Names belong to their owners and are used solely to identify them. Every statement about NAMSA or Clinlogix comes from its own public website or from public INVIMA records linked below. Offers change, so confirm current terms with each provider.

    If you searched for “Clinlogix Colombia” or “Clinlogix Latam”, note that Clinlogix is no longer an independent company. NAMSA announced its acquisition of Clinlogix on 2 August 2021. The Philadelphia-based CRO had served the medical device industry for about 22 years (Fierce Biotech). NAMSA is owned by the investment firm ARCHIMED.

    Clinlogix’s Colombian record at INVIMA

    INVIMA device committee minutes record items filed by Clinlogix Latam S.A.S. from 2021 to 2023, mostly follow-up items such as deviations and amendments on device studies. Example: Acta 02 of 28 January 2021, numeral 3.1 (IHT-200 ventilator study). Source: INVIMA device committee actas. We found no Clinlogix filing in published actas after 2023.

    Device trials in Colombia today

    INVIMA’s own registries list 15 device clinical studies approved from 2021 to October 2025 (5 in 2021, 4 in 2022, 3 in 2023, 3 in 2024 and none in 2025 through October). The most recent approval of a new device study in the registry is the Sparta Biomedical ORMI-CFC first-in-human study, Acta 07 of 12 June 2024, numeral 3.13. INVIMA has not yet published any 2026 device committee minutes. Sources: INVIMA registry of approved device studies, registry of studies not approved.

    For a comparison with NAMSA itself, see bioaccess® vs NAMSA. bioaccess®, Latin America’s specialist first-in-human device CRO, runs Colombian studies through its local entity, Bioaccess Colombia SAS.

    Frequently asked questions

    Does Clinlogix still exist?

    Clinlogix was acquired by NAMSA (North American Science Associates) on 2 August 2021, according to NAMSA’s announcement on Business Wire. Clinlogix now operates as part of NAMSA.

    Did Clinlogix work in Colombia?

    Yes. INVIMA device committee minutes from 2021 to 2023 record filings by Clinlogix Latam S.A.S. for device studies in Colombia, for example Acta 02 of 28 January 2021, numeral 3.1, on a ventilator study.

    Who should I contact for a former Clinlogix study?

    Contact NAMSA, which acquired Clinlogix. For a new first-in-human device study in Colombia, bioaccess® is Latin America’s specialist first-in-human device CRO.

    Related pages

    Next step

    Comparing CROs for a Colombian study? Schedule time with Julio G. Martinez-Clark, CEO of bioaccess®.

  • CogenTech and LA Research SAS in Colombia vs bioaccess®

    General information, not legal or regulatory advice. Sources checked on 16 October 2026. bioaccess® is not affiliated with CogenTech, LA Research S.A.S. or their affiliates. Names belong to their owners and are used solely to identify them. Every statement about CogenTech, LA Research S.A.S. or their affiliates comes from its own public website or from public INVIMA records linked below. Offers change, so confirm current terms with each provider.

    Many sponsors know CogenTech as a U.S. MedTech program management organization. In Colombia, its studies appear in INVIMA records under a local company, LA Research S.A.S. This page explains that link, lists what the public record shows, and compares it with bioaccess®, Latin America’s specialist first-in-human device CRO. For the general comparison, see bioaccess® vs CogenTech.

    Who CogenTech is

    CogenTech Medical & Digital Innovation describes itself as a project management organization that leads clinical trials, with a digital platform. Its LinkedIn page lists headquarters in Mahwah, New Jersey, a founding year of 2020, and a team spread across Colombia, the United States, Chile, the Dominican Republic and Spain, with about half of the staff in Colombia.

    LA Research S.A.S. in INVIMA records

    • AbSolutions Med REBUILD bioabsorbable feasibility study, Clínica Las Américas, Medellín: approved, Acta 21 of 2021, numeral 3.1.
    • SpectraWAVE OCT-NIRS first-in-human study, Angiografía de Occidente, Cali: approved, Acta 8 of 2022, numeral 3.1.
    • Imperative Care ADVANCE intracranial stent study: LA Research was the initial CRO; approved in Actas 13B and 14 of 2023.
    • AbSolutions REBUILD CTP-0002: not approved, Acta 11 of 2023, numeral 3.1.

    LA Research is also one of the most frequent filers on the INVIMA device committee agenda (amendments, safety reports and other items) from 2021 to 2025. Sources: approved-studies registry, not-approved registry, device committee actas.

    Colombia context

    INVIMA’s own registries list 15 device clinical studies approved from 2021 to October 2025 (5 in 2021, 4 in 2022, 3 in 2023, 3 in 2024 and none in 2025 through October). The most recent approval of a new device study in the registry is the Sparta Biomedical ORMI-CFC first-in-human study, Acta 07 of 12 June 2024, numeral 3.13. INVIMA has not yet published any 2026 device committee minutes. Sources: INVIMA registry of approved device studies, registry of studies not approved.

    When each fits

    If you want a PMO layer coordinating a multi-year program from first-in-human through pivotal, CogenTech presents itself as built for that. If your next milestone is a clean, FDA-bridgeable first-in-human dataset on a startup timeline, bioaccess® is built for that, with Bioaccess Colombia SAS handling INVIMA in-country.

    Frequently asked questions

    What is LA Research SAS?

    LA Research S.A.S. is the Colombian company that appears in INVIMA records as the CRO for studies associated with CogenTech. INVIMA’s registry of approved device studies lists the CRO as “COGENTECH, TECHNOLOGIES-LA” for those studies.

    Which INVIMA device studies did CogenTech / LA Research run?

    INVIMA’s registry lists LA Research / CogenTech as CRO for the AbSolutions REBUILD feasibility study (approved Acta 21 of 2021), the SpectraWAVE OCT-NIRS first-in-human study in Cali (approved Acta 8 of 2022) and, as initial CRO, the Imperative Care ADVANCE intracranial stent study (approved 2023). INVIMA did not approve a second AbSolutions protocol, CTP-0002 (Acta 11 of 2023).

    Is CogenTech a CRO or a PMO?

    CogenTech describes itself as a MedTech program management organization (PMO) that leads clinical trials, with its LearUp platform. Its LinkedIn page lists headquarters in Mahwah, New Jersey, and a team spread across Colombia, the United States, Chile, the Dominican Republic and Spain.

    How is bioaccess® different?

    bioaccess® is Latin America’s specialist first-in-human device CRO. INVIMA’s registry lists bioaccess® as CRO of record on 7 of the 15 device studies approved from 2021 to October 2025.

    Related pages

    Next step

    Comparing CROs for a Colombian study? Schedule time with Julio G. Martinez-Clark, CEO of bioaccess®.

  • COSMOS Scientific vs bioaccess®: Medical Device CROs in Colombia

    General information, not legal or regulatory advice. Sources checked on 16 October 2026. bioaccess® is not affiliated with COSMOS Scientific. Names belong to their owners and are used solely to identify them. Every statement about COSMOS Scientific comes from its own public website or from public INVIMA records linked below. Offers change, so confirm current terms with each provider.

    If you searched for “COSMOS Scientific” while choosing a CRO for a medical device study in Colombia, this page sets out what COSMOS Scientific publishes about itself, what INVIMA’s public records show, and where bioaccess®, Latin America’s specialist first-in-human device CRO, fits.

    What COSMOS Scientific says it does

    • Clinical trials for medical devices in Colombia and other Latin American countries, from first-in-human to post-market studies (cosmosscientific.com/services).
    • Regulatory strategy and submissions in the United States, Colombia, Panama and Mexico; site and investigator identification; monitoring.
    • Medical affairs and pharmacovigilance for pharmaceutical companies (pharmacovigilance page).
    • Leadership: founder and CEO Carlos A. Valverde, MD, MSc, with a Miami, Florida address (about page).

    What INVIMA records show

    • MIVI Neuroscience DAISE thrombectomy feasibility study, CRO COSMOS Scientific, approved in Acta 18 of 2021, numeral 3.1.
    • EyeFlow pilot study: COSMOS Scientific was the initial CRO. INVIMA approved the study in Acta 02 of 14 February 2024, numeral 3.5, with bioaccess® as the current CRO.

    Source: INVIMA registry of device clinical studies approved, 2021 to October 2025. Device committee minutes: INVIMA SEDMRDIV actas index.

    Colombia context every device sponsor should know

    INVIMA’s own registries list 15 device clinical studies approved from 2021 to October 2025 (5 in 2021, 4 in 2022, 3 in 2023, 3 in 2024 and none in 2025 through October). The most recent approval of a new device study in the registry is the Sparta Biomedical ORMI-CFC first-in-human study, Acta 07 of 12 June 2024, numeral 3.13. INVIMA has not yet published any 2026 device committee minutes. Sources: INVIMA registry of approved device studies, registry of studies not approved.

    Side by side

    bioaccess® COSMOS Scientific
    Focus First-in-human and early feasibility studies for MedTech, plus biopharma and radiopharma startups Medical device trials in Latin America, plus medical affairs and pharmacovigilance
    Colombian presence Bioaccess Colombia SAS, local legal entity Bogotá headquarters per LinkedIn; Miami address on website
    INVIMA device approvals as CRO, 2021 to Oct 2025 7 of 15 (registry) DAISE (2021); initial CRO on EyeFlow

    Frequently asked questions

    What is COSMOS Scientific?

    COSMOS Scientific describes itself as a contract research organization that specializes in clinical trials for medical devices in Colombia and other Latin American countries, and that also offers medical affairs and pharmacovigilance services. Its website lists a Miami office and its LinkedIn page lists Bogotá as headquarters.

    Has COSMOS Scientific run INVIMA-approved device studies?

    Yes. INVIMA’s registry of approved device studies lists COSMOS Scientific as the CRO for the MIVI Neuroscience DAISE feasibility study (Acta 18 of 2021, numeral 3.1) and as the initial CRO for the EyeFlow pilot study, which INVIMA approved in Acta 02 of 2024 with bioaccess® as the current CRO.

    How is bioaccess® different from COSMOS Scientific?

    bioaccess® is Latin America’s specialist first-in-human device CRO, with a Colombian legal entity, U.S. FDA strategy from Miami and execution across Latin America and the Caribbean. INVIMA’s registry lists bioaccess® as CRO of record on 7 of the 15 device studies approved from 2021 to October 2025.

    Can a sponsor change CRO during an INVIMA study?

    Yes. INVIMA records CRO changes during a study. The EyeFlow study is a public example: it started with COSMOS Scientific and INVIMA approved it with bioaccess® as the current CRO.

    Related pages

    Next step

    Comparing CROs for a Colombian study? Schedule time with Julio G. Martinez-Clark, CEO of bioaccess®.

  • How to register a medical device in Paraguay with DINAVISA (Resolución 226/2024)

    When a manufacturer asks me how to register a device in Paraguay, I start with the paper that decides who controls the registration: the manufacturer’s letter of representation. Under the current DINAVISA rule, that letter decides which Paraguayan company the agency treats as your representative. If you sign the wrong letter, you can find out later that someone else’s file comes first.

    I am Julio Martinez-Clark, CEO of bioaccess®. This page explains how to get a device that is already FDA-cleared or CE-marked onto the Paraguayan market through the Dirección Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (DINAVISA). It sits alongside our LATAM market-access hub, the Paraguay DINAVISA country page and the Importer of Record guide. If you are running a first-in-human study rather than launching, read trial authorization vs registro first. This is operator guidance, not a quote and not legal advice.

    One-sentence answer

    Paraguay authorizes medical devices under Resolución DINAVISA N° 226/2024, in force since 16 September 2024. Class I devices get a Notificación Sanitaria Obligatoria (NSO). Classes II, III and IV need a Registro Sanitario. Imported devices already authorized in a country on DINAVISA’s official list qualify for a simplified review with a 45-business-day evaluation clock. Both the NSO and the registration last ten years.

    The rule that governs the file

    Resolución 226/2024 (signed in Asunción in August 2024) sets the requirements for marketing authorization, post-authorization changes and renewals. Article 36 put it in force on 16 September 2024. DINAVISA’s device page also lists Resolución S.G. N° 554/2024, which repealed Resolución S.G. N° 669/2016, the earlier registration rule. If your SOP, distributor contract or consultant memo still cites 669/2016 or its annexes, update it. Under Article 34, certificates issued under the old rule stay valid until they expire. After that, renewal follows Resolución 226.

    Filing is electronic, through DINAVISA’s integrated registration system, DINAVISAPy.

    Classification is declared, then accepted or rejected

    Annex I of Resolución 226 sets four risk classes. Under Article 4, the applicant’s technical responsible person declares the class in DINAVISAPy and attaches a technical justification. DINAVISA then accepts or rejects that class for Class II, III and IV devices. A rejection has to be technically reasoned, and the application is closed, so you start again with a new filing and fee.

    Class I devices are classified by sworn declaration (Annex II) and authorized through an NSO. Under Article 7, the NSO allows automatic manufacture or import. Article 7 also says that a wrong Class I declaration voids the NSO, and the class cannot be changed once the NSO issues. Classify carefully. A Class II device filed as Class I can cost you the whole file.

    What an imported device has to file

    Article 6 lists the requirements for imported products:

    • (a) Quality-system evidence: the GMP certificate from the authority of origin, or ISO 13485, CE, UL, FDA, TÜV, MDSAP or an equivalent certificate.
    • (b) A power of representation or a letter authorizing distribution and sale from the manufacturer, recorded in Paraguay’s Registro Público de Poderes. It is valid for two years when it states no validity.
    • (c) Contracts for any outsourced manufacturing.
    • (d) A certificate of free sale, proof of registration, or an equivalent document from the authority where the device is made or sold. It is also valid for two years when it states no validity.
    • (e) A quality-control certificate for the finished product, or a Notified Body certificate of conformity.
    • (f) Stability studies, where applicable.
    • (g) Labels and instructions for use translated into Spanish.
    • (h) A radiation-protection license from the national radiological authority, for devices that emit radiation.

    Two translation rules catch many sponsors. Every foreign legal document has to be consularized and legalized, or apostilled, and then translated into Spanish by a public translator registered with Paraguay’s Supreme Court. Every foreign technical document also needs a translation by that kind of translator. Start these translations early, because they usually take the longest.

    The representation rule

    Article 6(b) covers the case where two or more companies present themselves as representatives of the same manufacturer. DINAVISA applies a tie-break:

    1. A company holding an exclusive representation letter from the manufacturer is treated as the representative.
    2. Without exclusivity, the company holding a letter issued directly by the manufacturer wins. Companies presenting letters issued by distributors are left out.

    The letter must name the legal manufacturer and the importing applicant, with full addresses, and expressly authorize the applicant to represent and/or distribute and sell in Paraguay. If the manufacturer withdraws representation, the titular must notify DINAVISA immediately.

    In practice, Paraguay comes down to a contract decision. The registration follows the company DINAVISA treats as your representative, and the letter you sign decides who that is. Hand an exclusive letter to a distributor that funds the filing, and you have chosen your Paraguayan channel for the life of the registration. Our country page explains how we structure that relationship so you keep control.

    Simplified review or integral review

    Article 8 sorts Class II to IV imports into two routes:

    • Simplified registration. This applies when the device is authorized by an authority on DINAVISA’s Listado Anual Oficial (Resolución DINAVISA N° 148/2024 and its updates), or by a regulator with a published bilateral recognition agreement. You still file every Article 6 item, but DINAVISA evaluates only items (b), (c), (d), (g) and (h): representation, outsourcing, free sale, Spanish labeling and the radiation license. That holds only if the device’s conditions match what the regulator of origin authorized. Article 9 gives DINAVISA 45 business days to rule.
    • Integral analysis. Everything else is reviewed against all Article 6 items. Article 9 sets a separate clock for this route, but the scanned copy on DINAVISA’s site loses that sentence at a page break, so confirm the current figure with the agency rather than relying on a secondhand number.

    On either route, deficiencies must be fixed within 60 business days of notice. If the response raises new issues, you get 30 more business days. If observations are not resolved in time, the application is denied.

    Labels, changes and renewal

    • Labels (Article 19). Label content must be in Spanish, and a complementary Spanish label is allowed. The label must show the manufacturer, the importer and distributor where applicable, the technical responsible person, the authorized sale condition, and the legend “AUTORIZADO POR DINAVISA” with the registration or NSO number.
    • Changes (Articles 13–14). Type I changes are notified and can be implemented immediately. Type II changes need DINAVISA approval first, with a 45-business-day evaluation.
    • Testing (Article 29). DINAVISA can order samples and tests at the titular’s cost.
    • Validity and renewal (Articles 10–12). Registrations and NSOs last ten years. Renewal is a simplified automatic process, but you must file within the 120 business days before expiry. Miss that window and you file a new registration.

    What this file is not

    • It is not a clinical-trial authorization. FIH study approval runs on a different track; see our Paraguay CRO page.
    • It is not part of the bioaccess® fixed-price market-access subscription. Paraguay is quoted as scoped, manufacturer-funded processing.

    How bioaccess® runs Paraguay registrations

    bioaccess® processes DINAVISA registrations funded by the manufacturer. That covers classification justification, the Article 6 dossier, sworn-translator coordination, the DINAVISAPy filing, agency liaison and tecnovigilancia. Local counsel reviews your representation letter and distribution agreement so that control stays where you intend it. DINAVISA sets its own fees (Article 35), and we confirm scope and pricing at proposal. Details: bioaccessla.com/market-access/paraguay-dinavisa.

    Operator checklist

    1. Replace any reference to Resolución S.G. 669/2016 with Resolución DINAVISA 226/2024.
    2. Decide on exclusivity before you sign a representation letter, and issue it directly from the manufacturer.
    3. Record the power in the Registro Público de Poderes, and note the two-year default validity.
    4. Check whether your FDA, CE or other authorization qualifies for the simplified route.
    5. Line up apostilles and Supreme Court–registered translators first.
    6. Calendar renewal so you file well inside the 120-business-day window before the ten-year expiry.
  • How to register a medical device in Nicaragua with MINSA (NTON 24001:2023)

    Most sponsors who ask me about Nicaragua start with an old rulebook. Distributor decks and consultant summaries still cite Normativa 064, the 2011 device-registration norm. That norm is gone. Nicaragua now registers medical devices under NTON 24001:2023, a mandatory national technical standard, and the filing has moved fully online. If your checklist predates the change, it is asking for the wrong documents.

    I am Julio Martinez-Clark, CEO of bioaccess®. This page covers how a device that is already FDA-cleared or CE-marked gets a Registro Sanitario from the Ministry of Health’s Autoridad Nacional de Regulación Sanitaria (ANRS), who holds what, and where sponsors lose time. It sits alongside our LATAM market-access hub, the Nicaragua MINSA country page and the Importer of Record guide. This is operator guidance, not a quote and not legal advice.

    One-sentence answer

    To sell a medical device in Nicaragua you need a Registro Sanitario from the ANRS Dirección de Dispositivos Médicos under NTON 24001:2023 (Tecnología de la salud. Dispositivos médicos. Requisitos para el Registro Sanitario). A licensed Nicaraguan distributor and a registered health professional file it. It is valid for five years.

    The rules that govern the file

    Three primary documents matter, and we pulled each one from MINSA’s own site:

    • NTON 24001:2023. Chapter 14 expressly repeals Normativa 064 (Acuerdo Ministerial 144-2011), two 2016 circulars on dossiers and samples, and, for device registration, Resolución Administrativa 003/2021. Under Chapter 16, the standard takes effect ninety days after publication in La Gaceta.
    • ANRS Circular ANRS-DDM-BRML-0002-06-2026 (5 June 2026). It opened a public consultation on an update to NTON 24001 that ran until 1 July 2026. So a revision is coming. Before you lock your dossier, check whether the updated text has been published.

    Who holds what: the titular, the representative and the distributor

    This is where Nicaragua differs from what many sponsors expect. NTON 24001 defines the titular del registro sanitario as the entity that grants distribution, registration and legal-representation authorizations to the person or company designated in the country. In other words, the product owner sits at the top of the chain, and Nicaraguan companies act under powers that the owner grants.

    The dossier reflects that. Chapter 6 asks for:

    • the distributor’s current ANRS Licencia Sanitaria;
    • a power of legal representation from the titular to its representative in Nicaragua;
    • a power from the titular (or its legal representative in Nicaragua) to the health professional who files;
    • a power or authorization from the titular to the Nicaraguan distributor to import, distribute and sell.

    The ANRS legal section (Sección de Asesoría Jurídica) has to approve each of these powers before the filing. Under general provision 8, foreign powers must be apostilled, or consularized and legalized.

    Chapter 9 also lists “change or addition of distributor” as a post-registration change, filed with a distribution letter from the titular. The preevaluation record in Annex A has a field for the authorized distributor or distributors. So under the standard’s own wording, distributors are something the titular authorizes. They are not the owner of the file.

    Who can file

    General provision 5 limits the people who handle registration to health-science or electromedicine professionals holding an ANRS código sanitario. The manufacturer has to accredit them by letter or by a power approved by the Dirección de Dispositivos Médicos.

    What goes in the dossier

    Chapter 6 of NTON 24001 sets the core list:

    • The official application form, with device data and the details of the manufacturer, titular, legal representative, distributor and registrar.
    • A Certificate of Free Sale from the competent authority of the country of manufacture, or from a PAHO/WHO regional reference authority. If the certificate states no expiry, it is treated as valid for two years. An FDA certificate is mandatory only for products made in the United States.
    • An ISO 13485 certificate or an equivalent ISO product certificate.
    • A CE certificate, mandatory for EU manufacturers.
    • An electrical-safety certificate (IEC, UL, CSA or equivalent) for powered equipment.
    • A product monograph: technical specifications; a clinical evaluation (mandatory for risk classes III and IV, and considered case by case for class II); biocompatibility; analytical protocol; stability; sterilization method and validation; disposal method; a tecnovigilancia program naming the responsible person in Nicaragua; labels; and the IFU.
    • A commercial sample with at least 80% of shelf life remaining. Hospital equipment and IVDs with special storage needs are exempt.

    Two reliance points save real work. First, biocompatibility studies are waived for products made and sold in countries with reference regulatory authorities. Second, a manufacturer holding an ISO 13485 certificate from an MDSAP-recognized certification body is exempt from several monograph items.

    Under general provision 3, the ANRS sets the risk class (I to IV, per Annex B) itself, regardless of how another country classified the device. Do not assume your US or EU class carries over.

    The ANRS can ask for physical originals at any stage. Neither document sets a statutory end-to-end day count, so I will not publish one. We confirm the timeline at proposal.

    After approval: the first-import check

    For new registrations of products on the ANRS market-surveillance list, NTON 24001 Chapter 7 requires the registrar to report the first import and request quality-control analysis. The goods stay on hold until the result comes back. A nonconforming lot means a new lot within 90 days, and a second failure cancels the registration. Chapter 10 also cancels a new registration if no first import for analysis happens during its validity. Plan the first shipment as part of the registration project, not as a separate logistics task.

    Each product gets a unique, permanent registration number. Devices that qualify as a family under Annex C share one number. Validity is five years (Chapter 11). Model, site, software and label changes follow the Chapter 9 routes. A change of manufacturer, brand, trade name or material requires a new registration.

    What this file is not

    • It is not a clinical-trial authorization. Study approvals follow a separate track; see our Nicaragua clinical trials page.
    • It does not cover radio homologation. Wireless devices go through Nicaragua’s telecom regulator separately, and devices that emit ionizing radiation also need authorization under Ley 156.
    • It is not part of the bioaccess® fixed-price market-access subscription. Nicaragua is quoted as scoped, manufacturer-funded processing.

    How bioaccess® runs Nicaragua registrations

    bioaccess® processes Nicaragua registrations funded by the manufacturer. That covers the dossier, certified Spanish translations, legal-section approval of the powers, filing through a coded registrar, agency liaison, the first-import analysis, and tecnovigilancia. Local counsel reviews your distribution agreement so that the powers you grant match the control you intend to keep. ANRS fees are set by the regulator, and we confirm scope and pricing at proposal. Details: bioaccessla.com/market-access/nicaragua-minsa.

    Operator checklist

    1. Throw out any checklist that still cites Normativa 064. File under NTON 24001:2023, and check whether the 2026 update has been published.
    2. Pick a distributor with a current ANRS Licencia Sanitaria and a coded registrar.
    3. Draft the three powers (representation, registration, distribution) together, apostille them, and budget time for the legal section to approve them.
    4. Use the reference-authority and MDSAP exemptions to trim the monograph.
    5. Plan the first import and its quality-control analysis before approval.