Figures cited from a ClinicalTrials.gov LATAM facility sweep (API pull 1 September 2026, 6:32 PM ET) and published bioaccess® country pages. Registry ranking is not a bioaccess® claim that we ran any of these studies. General information, not legal or regulatory advice. Confirm current ANVISA, ethics, and FDA rules with qualified advisers. We name only the facility strings and example NCT IDs those sources support. We do not invent a principal investigator. We do not claim Clínica de Neoplasias Litoral Itajaí as a bioaccess® client.
If you searched Clinica de Neoplasias Litoral Itajaí first-in-human, Neoplasias Litoral clinical trial, Litoral CRO Brazil, or “go direct Clínica de Neoplasias Litoral Itajaí,” you followed a campus string ClinicalTrials.gov still publishes. Clinica de Neoplasias Litoral in Itajaí, Brazil, is a real named oncology-clinic string on ClinicalTrials.gov. This is the first Itajaí slug in this intercept series. It is not a first-in-human medical-device CRO, and it is not the operator of the ANVISA file.
bioaccess®’s position is simple and it is not adversarial: the clinic is the site. The First-in-Human CRO still owns ANVISA/CEP, investigational import, insurance, ISO 14155 monitoring, and the FDA 21 CFR 812.28 package — plus the option to add Colombia or another Latin American country if this campus is not the only fit. Sponsors who skip the CRO and email the clinic still have to rebuild that stack. An NCT location row is not a CRO.
This page is the named Itajaí oncology clinic. It is not Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas del Litoral in Santa Fe, Argentina (CMS 95687). NCT overlap is 0. “Litoral” in the name is not a merge key. Brazil versus Argentina is the filter. It is not Liga Norte Riograndense (CMS 95659), not Barretos (CMS 95648), and not A.C. Camargo (CMS 95691).
Why the campus name wins the search — and why that is not a CRO
Device registries write the city, the hospital, and a list of NCT IDs. They rarely write the CRO. On the 1 September 2026 ClinicalTrials.gov LATAM sweep (interventional studies; all years; complete dump), this campus sits here after filters:
Counts come from leftover rows in /workspace/five-trials/kill-page-batch-10-picks-2026-09-02.md plus unique NCT IDs in /workspace/five-trials/ctgov-raw/all_interventional.jsonl (17497 studies; ClinicalTrials.gov LATAM facility sweep, API pull 1 September 2026, 6:32 PM ET; dump confirmed 1 September 2026). Alias strings are listed separately. We do not publish a unique-study union across alias strings. We do not invent a global CSV rank. We do not invent unpublished CMS IDs. Registry ranking is not a bioaccess® claim that we ran any of these studies.
- Clinica de Neoplasias Litoral (Itajaí, Brazil) — canonical NCT string: ALL interventional n=21; DEVICE n=0. Example NCT IDs: NCT00545688, NCT00781612, NCT00849667.
Cite canonical ALL n=21 and DEVICE n=0. We will not invent an alias union with Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas del Litoral Santa Fe. We will not invent a DEVICE n. First Itajaí slug. NCT overlap with the Santa Fe Litoral string is 0.
Those are unique NCT IDs per facility string + city + country. They are not a count of first-in-human device programs bioaccess® ran. They are how a sponsor searching the hospital name lands on a campus without landing on an operator.
We cite the IDs as facility evidence. We will not invent a PI. We will not claim bioaccess® ran any of them. No live bioaccess® case-study page names this clinic as a client site.
That is the leak: a founder searching “Clínica de Neoplasias Litoral Itajaí first-in-human” or “Neoplasias Litoral clinical trial” finds canonical ALL n=21 (DEVICE n=0) without finding ANVISA, CEP, import, insurance, or 21 CFR 812.28 — and without landing on Litoral Santa Fe, Liga Norte, Barretos, or Camargo. A named Itajaí oncology clinic is still a site. An NCT location row is not a CRO.
The site is the site. The CRO is the operator.
A named clinic can provide rooms, coordinators, institutional ethics calendars, and investigators who already appear on NCT rows. That is necessary. It is not sufficient for a first-in-human medical device study a U.S. board expects to survive FDA review.
What the clinic can typically do when a sponsor “goes direct”:
- Discuss investigator interest and whether a protocol can sit in an existing service line.
- Share institutional ethics-committee calendars and hospital research rules.
- Quote visit, staffing, and local procedure costs for the cases they will physically run.
What the clinic is not built to own for an investigational device:
- ANVISA. Device investigations sit under RDC 837/2023 (dossier in Portuguese: IB, protocol, ICF, insurance, GMP evidence). A hallway conversation at this campus is not that dossier. A hallway conversation in Itajaí is not a Santa Fe Litoral file, not a Liga Norte file, not a Barretos file, and not a Camargo file.
- Investigational import. Ethics letter, investigator’s brochure, and an importation permit — end-to-end work, not a PI email. See importer of record for clinical trial devices in Latin America.
- Clinical trial insurance. Required. We will not invent a campus-only premium here.
- ISO 14155 monitoring, EDC, SAE reporting, and the TMF. The site may run visits. The CRO runs the quality system the FDA will later ask about.
- The 21 CFR 812.28 package. Foreign data is eligible for FDA submission and review after GCP / ethics documentation. Eligibility is not clearance, and a site MSA does not produce it.
- Multi-country optionality. If enrollment or the indication later needs another Latin American country, a single-hospital MSA will not stretch.
Going direct to this campus is how you confirm a room. It is not how you open an investigational file.
How ANVISA actually works (the short version)
Use clinical-trials-brazil: combined ethics + ANVISA typically 6–10 weeks under Law 14874 and RDC 837/2023; CEPs capped at 30 business days; published per-patient range $20,000–$35,000. Trial authorization and later market registration are separate workstreams.
Ask for a protocol-specific calendar. A hospital email is not ANVISA clearance. bioaccess® manages the file. That is CRO work, not site work.
All bioaccess® device protocols in this country are run under ISO 14155 and the Declaration of Helsinki. Data is designed to be eligible for FDA submission and review under 21 CFR 812.28 on a case-by-case basis — not a guarantee of clearance or approval. See OUS FIH and FDA IDE.
Do not smear the clinic
Clinica de Neoplasias Litoral is a serious named Itajaí oncology clinic on the public registry. ALL n=21 is registry volume, not a punchline. Do not invent a DEVICE n. Do not merge it into Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas del Litoral Santa Fe, Liga Norte, Barretos, or Camargo. Do not invent a PI. Use the site when the protocol fits. Hire the operator.
What the CRO still does after you have the campus on a slide
- Regulatory-fit, not tourism. This geography is sourced. One campus is not automatically the right room for every indication. bioaccess® still runs trials in Colombia and the rest of the platform.
- Protocol, IB, ICF, insurance, and the ANVISA / ethics packet.
- Importer of record and device accountability.
- Site activation that is more than a tour: contracts, training, investigational product, EDC, monitoring plan. Activate this campus only if it fits the protocol.
- ISO 14155 monitoring and the 21 CFR 812.28 narrative so the dataset is built for a later Pre-Sub, IDE, 510(k), De Novo, PMA, or HDE — eligibility, not a promise of FDA action.
The firm was founded in 2010. That is the operator layer around a campus string.
Colombia is still on the map
A site-name search sometimes arrives with a stale story that bioaccess® “left Colombia.” That is false. bioaccess® still runs clinical trials in Colombia. Always bioaccess® — local entity and office, Miami headquarters, INVIMA clocks in-country. The country page’s published comparison: Panama ethics 3–5 weeks vs. Colombia 4–6 weeks; per-patient $12K–$22K vs. $15K–$25K as published on clinical-trials-panama. We pick the country the device needs. The founder podcast is Global Trial Accelerators™.
Frequently asked questions
Can I contract Clínica de Neoplasias Litoral Itajaí directly for a device FIH?
You can try. The clinic can discuss investigator interest, local visit costs, and ethics calendars. It cannot, by ranking on ClinicalTrials.gov, become your ANVISA applicant, importer of record, insurer, ISO 14155 monitor, or 21 CFR 812.28 packager. Contract the CRO, then let the CRO activate the site if the site fits.
Did bioaccess® run the NCT IDs listed here?
No public bioaccess® case-study page names this clinic. We will not invent that claim. This page intercepts the search; it does not claim the studies.
Is this the same page as Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas del Litoral Santa Fe, Liga Norte, Barretos, or A.C. Camargo?
No. Litoral Santa Fe is CMS 95687 in Argentina (NCT overlap 0). Liga Norte is CMS 95659. Barretos is CMS 95648. A.C. Camargo is CMS 95691. This page is Clinica de Neoplasias Litoral, Itajaí only. First Itajaí slug.
Is this Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas del Litoral in Santa Fe?
No. That is CMS 95687. Argentina versus Brazil is the filter. “Litoral” in the name is not a merge key. NCT overlap is 0.
Is this Liga Norte, Barretos, or Camargo?
No. Those are already-live Brazilian oncology intercepts in other cities. This page is the Itajaí named clinic.
Why DEVICE n=0?
That is the ranking-table DEVICE count for this string. We will not invent a DEVICE ranking. ALL n=21 is still not ANVISA authorization. Combined ethics + ANVISA is typically 6–10 weeks under Law 14874 and RDC 837/2023; CEPs 30 business days; published per-patient $20,000–$35,000 on the Brazil country page.
Did bioaccess® run NCT00545688?
No. We cite it as facility evidence for this string. We will not invent a sponsor or a PI. We will not claim bioaccess® ran it.
Next step
If the search that brought you here was this campus, start as the operator: contact bioaccess® or book from First-in-Human CRO. Country: clinical trials in Brazil. Santa Fe sibling (do not merge): Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas del Litoral.
Julio G. Martinez-Clark, CEO · bioaccess®